Title
Evolution, Providence, and Gouldian Contingency
Department/School
Philosophy
Date
2008
Document Type
Article
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0034412508009499
Abstract
Stephen Jay Gould and others have argued that what we know about evolution implies that human beings are a ‘cosmic accident’. In this paper I examine an argument for Gould’s view and then attempt to show that it fails. Contrary to the claims of Gould, Daniel Dennett, and others, it is a mistake to think that what we have learned from evolutionary biology somehow shows that human beings are mere accidents of natural history. Nor does what we know about the contingency of evolution give us good reason to reject the view that human beings came to be according to a divine providential plan.
Volume
44
Issue
4
Published in
Religious Studies
Citation/Other Information
Rota, Michael. "Evolution, providence, and Gouldian contingency." Religious Studies 44, no. 4 (2008): 393-412. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0034412508009499