Title
The Possibility Principle And the Truthmakers For Modal Truths
Department/School
Philosophy
Date
2010
Document Type
Article
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/00048400903193353
Abstract
A necessary part of David Armstrong’s account of truthmakers for modal truths is his Possibility principle: any truthmaker for a contingent truth is also a truthmaker for the possibility of the complement of that contingent truth (if T makes p true and p is contingent, then T makes }*p true). I criticize Armstrong’s Possibility principle for two reasons. First, his argument for the Possibility principle both relies on an unwarranted generalization and vitiates his desire for relevant truthmakers. His argument undercuts relevant truthmakers by entailing that each contingent being is a truthmaker for all modal truths. Second, even if the argument seems successful, the Possibility principle is subject to counterexamples. Armstrong’s being composed of more than fifty atoms makes it true that something composed of more than fifty atoms exists and that truth is contingent, but his being composed of more than fifty atoms does not make it true that it is possible that it is not the case that something composed of more than fifty atoms exists.
Volume
88
Issue
3
Published in
Australasian Journal of Philosophy
Citation/Other Information
Pawl, Timothy J. (2010). "The possibility principle and the truthmakers for modal truths." Australasian Journal of Philosophy 88, no. 3 (2010): 417-28. https://doi.org/10.1080/00048400903193353.