Title

Hylomorphism and Design: A Reconsideration of Aquinas's Fifth Way

Department/School

Philosophy

Date

2012

Document Type

Article

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5840/schoolman2012893/411

Abstract

Aquinas’s Fifth Way is usually taken to be an adumbration of Paley-like design arguments. Paley-like design arguments have fallen on hard times over the past few centuries, and most contemporary defenders of design arguments in support of theism favor some version of the fine-tuning argument. But fine-tuning design arguments, like Paley’s design argument, are consistent with atomism. And all such arguments are vulnerable to the objection that, given a long enough stretch of time and a sufficient number of universes, there would be no need to posit a designer. In this paper we argue that a deep understanding of Aquinas’s Fifth Way depends upon understanding his hylomorphic account of the nature of composite substance, an account that is inconsistent with atomism. We argue that if one grants hylomorphism, Aquinas’s Fifth Way is difficult to resist. And we defend Aquinas’s hylomorphism against several common objections.

Volume

89

Issue

3/4

Published in

The Modern Schoolman

Citation/Other Information

Kronen, John, and Sandra L. Menssen. "Hylomorphism and Design: A Reconsideration of Aquinas's Fifth Way." The Modern Schoolman 89, no. 3/4 (2012): 155-80. https://doi.org/10.5840/schoolman2012893/411

COinS